Petitions 5553-R of McCabe Bros. ex rel. Mackay

1 Cust. Ct. 539
United States Customs Court·Decided December 15, 1938·No. No. 40124·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

These petitions were filed by parties not entitled to refund of duties and were therefore held to be fatally defective. Richards v. United States (24 C. C. P. A. 243, T. D. 48670) cited. It was held that were the court to accept so-called amended petitions, which are in fact new petitions, filed by the proper parties in interest, it would be without jurisdiction because the action of the customs authorities became final and conclusive upon all parties at the completion of the sixty-day period after liquidation. The motion to amend was therefore denied and the petitions were dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitions 5553-R of McCabe Bros. ex rel. Mackay, 1 Cust. Ct. 539 (cusc 1938).

1 Cust. Ct. 539 (Petitions 5553-R of McCabe Bros. ex rel. Mackay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heemsoth Kerner Corp. v. United States
31 Cust. Ct. 113 (U.S. Customs Court, 1953)
Empey v. United States
23 Cust. Ct. 73 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)