Petitioner'S Conviction Is Void. See Archer v. State, 851 S.W.2D 157, 164 (Tenn. 1993).

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedMay 29, 1997
Docket02C01-9612-CC-00477
StatusPublished

This text of Petitioner'S Conviction Is Void. See Archer v. State, 851 S.W.2D 157, 164 (Tenn. 1993). (Petitioner'S Conviction Is Void. See Archer v. State, 851 S.W.2D 157, 164 (Tenn. 1993).) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petitioner'S Conviction Is Void. See Archer v. State, 851 S.W.2D 157, 164 (Tenn. 1993)., (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

SHERMAN A. HENDERSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) C. C. A. NO. 02C01-9612-CC-00477 ) vs. ) LAKE COUNTY ) BILLY COMPTON, WARDEN,

Respondent. ) No. 96-7428 ) ) FILED May 29, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr. ORDER Appellate C ourt Clerk

This matter is before the Court upon the state’s motion to dismiss the

above-captioned appeal. The petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the

trial court claiming that his sentence should be recalculated due to the denial of certain

sentencing credits. It appears the petitioner was originally convicted of first degree

murder and sentenced to life imprisonment in January, 1980. The trial court denied the

petition. The petitioner timely filed notice of appeal, and both the record and

petitioner’s brief have already been filed with this Court.

In its motion, the state argues that the trial court properly denied relief in

this case because it does not appear from the face of the judgment or record that the

petitioner’s conviction is void. See Archer v. State, 851 S.W.2d 157, 164 (Tenn. 1993).

The state further contends that the issue raised by the petitioner is not a proper

consideration for habeas corpus relief, but rather must be challenged under the Uniform

Administrative Procedures Act. We agree. See Brigham v. Lack, 755 S.W.2d 469, 471

(Tenn. Crim. App.), perm. to appeal denied, (Tenn. 1988); State v. Warren, 740 S.W.2d

427, 428 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1986), perm. to appeal denied, (Tenn. 1987).

Accordingly, finding no error of law mandating reversal, it is hereby

ORDERED that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 20,

Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Enter, this the ___ day of May, 1997.

_____________________________ PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUDGE

_____________________________ JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE

_____________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Archer v. State
851 S.W.2d 157 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1993)
State v. Warren
740 S.W.2d 427 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, 1986)
Brigham v. Lack
755 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Petitioner'S Conviction Is Void. See Archer v. State, 851 S.W.2D 157, 164 (Tenn. 1993)., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petitioners-conviction-is-void-see-archer-v-state--tenncrimapp-1997.