Petition To Modify

Oregon Supreme Court

Petition To Modify

184 P. 288, 94 Or. 131

DecidedNovember 12, 1919

StatusPublished

This text of 184 P. 288 (Petition To Modify) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petition To Modify, 184 P. 288, 94 Or. 131 (Or. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

HARRIS, J.

In an opinion rendered recently, the decree from which the defendant appealed was affirmed. Nothing was said in the opinion about costs [132]*132and for that reason an affirmation of the decree would allow the respondent to recover his costs and disbursements from the appellant. The defendant has filed a petition asking that the decree be modified to the extent of disallowing costs to either party. The trial court refused costs to either party and directed each to pay his own disbursements. We think that under all the circumstances of this case each party should pay his own disbursements in this court. It is therefore ordered that the decree appealed from be affirmed without costs to either party in either court.

Modified as to Costs.

Bean, Burnett and Johns, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARRIS, J.

In an opinion rendered recently, the decree from which the defendant appealed was affirmed. Nothing was said in the opinion about costs [132]*132and for that reason an affirmation of the decree would allow the respondent to recover his costs and disbursements from the appellant. The defendant has filed a petition asking that the decree be modified to the extent of disallowing costs to either party. The trial court refused costs to either party and directed each to pay his own disbursements. We think that under all the circumstances of this case each party should pay his own disbursements in this court. It is therefore ordered that the decree appealed from be affirmed without costs to either party in either court.

Modified as to Costs.

Bean, Burnett and Johns, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 P. 288, 94 Or. 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petition-to-modify-or-1919.