Petition 6504-R of Stein

16 Cust. Ct. 218
United States Customs Court·Decided July 1, 1946·No. No. 50865·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was established that in not following the prices advised by the appraiser and in transferring to the entry papers a sum not actually derived from a multiplication of the unit value and the net weight of the merchandise, petitioner’s broker had exhibited a lack of care in making the entry. However, it was held that there was nothing in the record tending to establish that there was an intention on his part to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or to misrepresent the facts or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. (Linen Thread Co. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 395, T. D. 41322, cited.) The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition 6504-R of Stein, 16 Cust. Ct. 218 (cusc 1946).

16 Cust. Ct. 218 (Petition 6504-R of Stein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Linen Thread Co. v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 395 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)