Petition 6403-R of Segal

13 Cust. Ct. 246
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 28, 1944
DocketNo. 49578
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Cust. Ct. 246 (Petition 6403-R of Segal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petition 6403-R of Segal, 13 Cust. Ct. 246 (cusc 1944).

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the petitioner made entry on March 19, 1943, at the invoice value, which did not include a 25 percent advance, of which he had notice on February 24, 1943. When the case was before the court on reappraisement the importer stipulated that the value of the merchandise was 25 percent higher than the entered value. While the court stated [247]*247that this act on the part of the petitioner was commendable, it was not sufficient to relieve him from payment of additional duties for undervaluation. In view of Lowe v. United States (15 Ct. Cust. Appls. 418, T. D. 42590) the court found that the petitioner failed to establish his good faith and the petition was denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lowe Co. v. United States
15 Ct. Cust. 418 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Cust. Ct. 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petition-6403-r-of-segal-cusc-1944.