Petition 6395-R of Scientific Glass Apparatus Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Petition 6395-R of Scientific Glass Apparatus Co.

12 Cust. Ct. 257

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 16, 1944

DocketNo. 49205

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Cust. Ct. 257 (Petition 6395-R of Scientific Glass Apparatus Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petition 6395-R of Scientific Glass Apparatus Co., 12 Cust. Ct. 257 (cusc 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The merchandise in question was entered at the invoiced values after an attempt was made to secure information from the appraiser as to any other values. The evidence disclosed that this type of English micro cover glasses was invoiced at prices comparable with prices charged this importer by an American concern for the same type of English glasses; that this was the first purchase made by the importer from a Canadian concern, and that the quantities were not unusually large. The collector appealed to reappraisement. Counsel finally agreed on a statement with prices higher than those as invoiced and entered. The court found that the entry at values below those found on final appraisement was made without intention to defraud the Government or to cbn-ceal the facts. The petition -was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The merchandise in question was entered at the invoiced values after an attempt was made to secure information from the appraiser as to any other values. The evidence disclosed that this type of English micro cover glasses was invoiced at prices comparable with prices charged this importer by an American concern for the same type of English glasses; that this was the first purchase made by the importer from a Canadian concern, and that the quantities were not unusually large. The collector appealed to reappraisement. Counsel finally agreed on a statement with prices higher than those as invoiced and entered. The court found that the entry at values below those found on final appraisement was made without intention to defraud the Government or to cbn-ceal the facts. The petition -was therefore granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Cust. Ct. 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petition-6395-r-of-scientific-glass-apparatus-co-cusc-1944.