Petition 6383-R of Rotaprint Machines, Inc.
This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 269 (Petition 6383-R of Rotaprint Machines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
It appeared from the record that the importer had been purchasing certain duplicating machines imported from Germany through the foreign manufacturer’s general American agent located in Cleveland, Ohio. Later the petitioner entered into an agreement with the manufacturer wherein the petitioner became exclusive agent of the manufacturer for the sale and distribution of these machines in certain eastern states. After counsel received information from Germany he advised the petitioner to enter at the invoice value, which was the contract price and the price the petitioner paid for the machines. It appeared that the invoice value was the export value, as defined in section 402. The appraiser advanced the value to what was claimed to be the foreign value, which apparently was the retail sales price of this merchandise in Germany. The petitioner filed an appeal to reappraisement (Reap. Dec. 5669 and 5848), wherein the value found by the appraiser was upheld. It was found that the -entire course of conduct of the petitioner was consistent with the desire to ascertain the correct dutiable value, and the evidence clearly showed an honest difference of opinion, and that the entry of the merchandise at a less value than that on final appraisement was without any intention to defraud the revenue or to conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petition was therefore granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Cust. Ct. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petition-6383-r-of-rotaprint-machines-inc-cusc-1943.