Petition 6331-R of Wilder & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Petition 6331-R of Wilder & Co.

10 Cust. Ct. 477

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 10, 1943

DocketNo. 48387

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Cust. Ct. 477 (Petition 6331-R of Wilder & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petition 6331-R of Wilder & Co., 10 Cust. Ct. 477 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Representatives of the two importing firms testified that prior to entry they turned over to their customs broker all documents, including invoices and bills of lading, relating to the importations in question; that the prices set forth therein were the only ones of which they had knowledge, and that instructions were issued to enter at such prices. It appeared that a member of the petitioning corporation, prior to entry, asked the appraiser for information [478]*478pertaining to dutiable value and was advised that no information was available. Subsequently the collector of customs appealed and when the case was called for hearing the higher values claimed by the Government were conceded by the importers (Reap. Dec. 5640). The court was of the opinion that the appeal of the petitioner to the customs officials reflects an honest effort to meet the burden of entering at the proper value. From an examination of the entire record the court was satisfied that there was no intention to defraud the revenue or to conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Representatives of the two importing firms testified that prior to entry they turned over to their customs broker all documents, including invoices and bills of lading, relating to the importations in question; that the prices set forth therein were the only ones of which they had knowledge, and that instructions were issued to enter at such prices. It appeared that a member of the petitioning corporation, prior to entry, asked the appraiser for information [478]*478pertaining to dutiable value and was advised that no information was available. Subsequently the collector of customs appealed and when the case was called for hearing the higher values claimed by the Government were conceded by the importers (Reap. Dec. 5640). The court was of the opinion that the appeal of the petitioner to the customs officials reflects an honest effort to meet the burden of entering at the proper value. From an examination of the entire record the court was satisfied that there was no intention to defraud the revenue or to conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petition was therefore granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Cust. Ct. 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petition-6331-r-of-wilder-co-cusc-1943.