Petition 6304-R of Tupman Thurlow Co.
10 Cust. Ct. 416
Opinion
Opinion by
From the record it appeared that the petitioner amended his.entry in accordance with what he believed was the price suggested by the. appraiser but, through some misunderstanding, failed to include the charge for insurance which the appraiser deemed to be a part of the value. It was found that the petitioner acted without intention to misrepresent the facts or to defraud the revenue of the United States. The petition was therefore granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Petition 6304-R of Tupman Thurlow Co., 10 Cust. Ct. 416 (cusc 1943).
10 Cust. Ct. 416 (Petition 6304-R of Tupman Thurlow Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.