Petition 6120-R of May Co.

9 Cust. Ct. 414
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 16, 1942
DocketNo. 47554
StatusPublished

This text of 9 Cust. Ct. 414 (Petition 6120-R of May Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petition 6120-R of May Co., 9 Cust. Ct. 414 (cusc 1942).

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

At the hearing three witnesses testified in behalf of the petitioning company. It appeared from this testimony that the customs broker who made the entry consulted several people, including the appraiser, in order to ascertain the correct value of the merchandise inasmuch as they found on the invoice there was a current selling price at the date of exportation that was higher than the other selling price there given. It appeared that after the merchandise had been appraised the witness learned from the New York office of the foreign manufacturer that a mistake had been made in “that they had neglected [415]*415to notify their principals in Belfast that they had furnished the appraiser in New York with new values, and that in fact the values that the examiner had in Cleveland were correct.” Upon receipt of such information the petitioner decided not to institute contemplated reappraisement proceedings. The appraiser at Cleveland testified that from his dealings over a period of many years hq was satisfied that the reputation of the petitioner was very good and that he had never considered any of its acts as an attempt to defraud the Government of its revenues. From a careful consideration of the record presented it was found there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case. • The petition was therefore granted.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Cust. Ct. 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petition-6120-r-of-may-co-cusc-1942.