Petition 6092-R of Emery

8 Cust. Ct. 434
United States Customs Court·Decided January 8, 1942·No. No. 46789·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

When the case was called for trial counsel for respondent moved for dismissal on the ground that the petition was not filed in accordance with section 489, Tariff Act of 1930. It appeared from, an examination of the official papers that the petition was filed 61 days after date of liquidation. But the 60th day, it appeared, was a Sunday. However, following Cintez v. United States (2 Cust. Ct. 49, C. D. 85) it was held that such fact does not relieve the petitioner from the statutory requirement of filing petition within 60 days after liquidation. In accordance therewith the petition was dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition 6092-R of Emery, 8 Cust. Ct. 434 (cusc 1942).

8 Cust. Ct. 434 (Petition 6092-R of Emery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cintez v. United States
2 Cust. Ct. 49 (U.S. Customs Court, 1939)