Petition 6089-R of Davison-Paxon Co.
8 Cust. Ct. 435
Opinion
Opinion by
It appeared from the testimony that in the instant case the discounts were greater than on prior importations. The court was of the opinion that this should have place'd the officials of the petitioning company on notice so that an inquiry should have been made to determine whether the invoiced and entered prices actually represented the dutiable value of the goods. The petition was therefore denied. Lowe v. United States (15 Ct. Cust. Appls. 418, T. D. 42590) cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Petition 6089-R of Davison-Paxon Co., 8 Cust. Ct. 435 (cusc 1942).
8 Cust. Ct. 435 (Petition 6089-R of Davison-Paxon Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lowe Co. v. United States
15 Ct. Cust. 418 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1928)