Petition 6068-R of S. S. Kresge Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Petition 6068-R of S. S. Kresge Co.

7 Cust. Ct. 289

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 9, 1941

DocketNo. 46422

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Cust. Ct. 289 (Petition 6068-R of S. S. Kresge Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petition 6068-R of S. S. Kresge Co., 7 Cust. Ct. 289 (cusc 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

[290]*290Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The facts in this case appear to be undisputed. The customs broker who made the entry testified that no appeal to reappraisement was taken following the appraiser’s advance because the duplicate notice of such advance had not been received by him and he did not learn of the increase in value until after the statutory time for filing appeals to reappraisement had expired. Prom an examination of the record and consideration of the facts, the court was satisfied that entry was made without any intention to defraud the revenue or deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[290]*290Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The facts in this case appear to be undisputed. The customs broker who made the entry testified that no appeal to reappraisement was taken following the appraiser’s advance because the duplicate notice of such advance had not been received by him and he did not learn of the increase in value until after the statutory time for filing appeals to reappraisement had expired. Prom an examination of the record and consideration of the facts, the court was satisfied that entry was made without any intention to defraud the revenue or deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Cust. Ct. 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petition-6068-r-of-s-s-kresge-co-cusc-1941.