Petition 5979-R of May Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Petition 5979-R of May Co.

4 Cust. Ct. 510

United States Customs Court·Decided June 5, 1940·No. No. 43877·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Evans, J.

The testimony did not disclose how it actually came about that the merchandise was undervalued. It was held that for the petitioner to rest his cause on statements following the language of the statute that he did not intend to defraud the revenues, or conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case, or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise, does not meet the requirements of the statute in order to warrant relief. On the record presented the petition was denied. Gresham v. United States (27 C. C. P. A. 242, C. A. D. 70) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Evans, J.

The testimony did not disclose how it actually came about that the merchandise was undervalued. It was held that for the petitioner to rest his cause on statements following the language of the statute that he did not intend to defraud the revenues, or conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case, or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise, does not meet the requirements of the statute in order to warrant relief. On the record presented the petition was denied. Gresham v. United States (27 C. C. P. A. 242, C. A. D. 70) cited.

Petition 5979-R of May Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 510 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 510 (Petition 5979-R of May Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.