Petit v. Petit
This text of 485 A.2d 1392 (Petit v. Petit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
On appeal,' plaintiff Therese Petit alleges that the Superior Court erred in refusing to give her requested jury instruction on the standard of care automobile drivers must observe. After reviewing the instruction given, we find no error. The general instruction on the standard of care was accurate and complete, and it was consistent with plaintiffs theory of liability. Schneider v. Richardson, 438 A.2d 896, 897 (Me.1981). “When the jury has been properly instructed on the legal principle involved in the case, amplification in application or otherwise is left to the discretion of the presiding justice.” Olsen v. French, 456 A.2d 869, 877 (Me.1983).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
485 A.2d 1392, 1985 Me. LEXIS 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petit-v-petit-me-1985.