Petit v. Framing Specialty

877 So. 2d 932, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11010, 2004 WL 1645955
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 2004·No. No. 1D02-4935·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gary Wayne Petit, the claimant, challenges a worker’s compensation order in favor of Framing Specialty and Bridgefield Employers, jointly the employer/carrier, which denies, without prejudice, his claim for reimbursement for medical treatment. Because the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims is supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Manning, 685 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). As the parties have stipulated in their mediation agreement, the claimant is entitled to have the employer/carrier pay pursuant to the appropriate fee schedule for the claimant’s medical treatment on March 15, 2002,,,at Ft. Walton Beach Medical Center, upon submission to the carrier of the proper forms for payment, a form UB-92 or its equivalent.

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petit v. Framing Specialty, 877 So. 2d 932, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11010, 2004 WL 1645955 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

877 So. 2d 932 (Petit v. Framing Specialty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Manning
685 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)