Petit v. Framing Specialty

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Petit v. Framing Specialty

877 So. 2d 932, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11010, 2004 WL 1645955

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 26, 2004

DocketNo. 1D02-4935

StatusPublished

This text of 877 So. 2d 932 (Petit v. Framing Specialty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petit v. Framing Specialty, 877 So. 2d 932, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11010, 2004 WL 1645955 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gary Wayne Petit, the claimant, challenges a worker’s compensation order in favor of Framing Specialty and Bridgefield Employers, jointly the employer/carrier, which denies, without prejudice, his claim for reimbursement for medical treatment. Because the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims is supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Manning, 685 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). As the parties have stipulated in their mediation agreement, the claimant is entitled to have the employer/carrier pay pursuant to the appropriate fee schedule for the claimant’s medical treatment on March 15, 2002,,,at Ft. Walton Beach Medical Center, upon submission to the carrier of the proper forms for payment, a form UB-92 or its equivalent.

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gary Wayne Petit, the claimant, challenges a worker’s compensation order in favor of Framing Specialty and Bridgefield Employers, jointly the employer/carrier, which denies, without prejudice, his claim for reimbursement for medical treatment. Because the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims is supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Manning, 685 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). As the parties have stipulated in their mediation agreement, the claimant is entitled to have the employer/carrier pay pursuant to the appropriate fee schedule for the claimant’s medical treatment on March 15, 2002,,,at Ft. Walton Beach Medical Center, upon submission to the carrier of the proper forms for payment, a form UB-92 or its equivalent.

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

877 So. 2d 932, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11010, 2004 WL 1645955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petit-v-framing-specialty-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack