Petit-Homme v. State

616 So. 2d 642, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4736, 1993 WL 130961
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 28, 1993
DocketNo. 92-1915
StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 642 (Petit-Homme v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petit-Homme v. State, 616 So. 2d 642, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4736, 1993 WL 130961 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress. See Johnson v. State, 438 So.2d 774 (Fla.1983), cert, denied, 465 U.S. 1051, 104 S.Ct. 1329, 79 L.Ed.2d 724 (1984). However, we remand for resentencing to determine the appropriate credit for time spent in jail. The trial court informed appellant that he was entitled to such credit, and the only issue to be decided on remand is the actual number of days. See Brown v. State, 584 So.2d 209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., GUNTHER, J., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. State
584 So. 2d 209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Johnson v. State
438 So. 2d 774 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 So. 2d 642, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4736, 1993 WL 130961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petit-homme-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.