Peterson (Veronica) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided January 18, 2022·No. 84027·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

VERONICA LYNN PETERSON, No. 84027 Appellant, vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. JAN 1 8 2022 A. BROWN PREPAE

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to reconsider decision and motion for appointment of counsel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for reconsideration and denying a motion for appointment of counsel, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Phelps v. State, 111 Nev. 1021, 1022-23, 900 P.2d 344, 344-45 (1995); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

, J. Hardesty

_ "ealsau.0 , J. , J. Stiglich —(A Hern on rimws

SupetEmE CouRT OF NEvADA

(0) 1947A <1.6Pro

;• 7 • 3. cc: Hon. Kathleen E. De]aney, District Judge Veronica Lynn Peterson Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

iC)) 1947A •V?).

• 41 4,•• • ' -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterson (Veronica) v. State, (Neb. 2022).

Peterson (Veronica) v. State (Peterson (Veronica) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)
Phelps v. State
900 P.2d 344 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1995)