Peterson v. Wayne Lovelady's Frontier Ford Corp.
This text of 2 Navajo Rptr. 44 (Peterson v. Wayne Lovelady's Frontier Ford Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navajo Nation Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal in the above-entitled matter, filed the 30th day of April, 1979, having been received and considered by the Acting Chief Justice pursuant to 7 N.T.C. 801, the Court finds:
I.7 N.T.C. 801(a) and Rule 2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure require that an appeal be from a final judgment or order.
2.The opinion of the Crownpoint District Court, dated April 2, I979, is not a final judgment, but is restricted to the question of the jurisdiction of the Crownpoint Court.
3.The appellate may raise the question of the Court's jurisdiction after a final decision on the merits.
4.This Court has previously held in Thompson v. General Electric Credit Corporation, et al., 1 Nav. R. 234, Todachine, et al., v. The Navajo Tribe, et al., 1 Nav. R. 245, and Howard Dana and Associ[45]*45ates v. The Navajo Housing Authority, 1 Nav. R. 255, that there is no right to an interlocutory appeal.
THEREFORE, the appeal in the above-entitled matter is DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Navajo Rptr. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-wayne-loveladys-frontier-ford-corp-navajoctapp-1979.