Peterson v. Wagner

198 P. 35, 52 Cal. App. 795, 1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 382
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peterson v. Wagner. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 Cal. App. 1
California Court of Appeal·Decided March 21, 1921·No. Civ. No. 2263.·Published

Opinion

On the stipulation of the parties to this appeal and those to the appeal in Peterson v. Wagner and Merkeley, Civil No. 2264, the two appeals were considered together, so far as the points urged for a reversal are concerned. We have this day filed an opinion in Civil No. 2264, affirming the judgment. In said opinion; in accordance with the stipulation mentioned, we have considered and disposed of all the points raised on both appeals which we conceived required special consideration adversely to the appellants in both appeals. Accordingly, upon the authority of Peterson v. Wagner and Merkeley et al. (Civil No. 2264), ante, p. 1, [198 P. 25], the judgment in Civil No. 2263, Peterson v. Wagner and Hall et al., is affirmed.

Prewett, P. J., pro tem., and Burnett, J., concurred. *Page 796

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterson v. Wagner, 198 P. 35, 52 Cal. App. 795, 1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 382 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921).

198 P. 35 (Peterson v. Wagner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peterson v. Wagner
198 P. 25 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)