Peterson v. United Parcel Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peterson v. United Parcel Service

74 A.D.2d 627, 424 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10288

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 74 A.D.2d 627 (Peterson v. United Parcel Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peterson v. United Parcel Service, 74 A.D.2d 627, 424 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10288 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated June 27, 1979, which affirmed an order of the New York State Division of Human Rights dismissing petitioner’s complaint upon a finding of no probable cause to believe that respondents had engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice relating to his discharge from employment. Order confirmed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding dismissed. The evidence before the State Division of Human Rights substantially supported its determination (Matter of Lundy v United Parcel Serv., 71 AD2d 993). Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Gibbons and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated June 27, 1979, which affirmed an order of the New York State Division of Human Rights dismissing petitioner’s complaint upon a finding of no probable cause to believe that respondents had engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice relating to his discharge from employment. Order confirmed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding dismissed. The evidence before the State Division of Human Rights substantially supported its determination (Matter of Lundy v United Parcel Serv., 71 AD2d 993). Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Gibbons and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 627, 424 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-united-parcel-service-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack