Peterson v. . the Ocean Electric Railway Company
108 N.E. 200, 214 N.Y. 605, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1264
This text of 108 N.E. 200 (Peterson v. . the Ocean Electric Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peterson v. . the Ocean Electric Railway Company, 108 N.E. 200, 214 N.Y. 605, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1264 (N.Y. 1915).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Peterson v. Ocean Electric Ry. Co. (214 N. Y. 43).
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan and Cardozo, JJ. Seabury, J., dissents on the ground that the plaintiff’s wife was not, as matter of law, guilty of contributory negligence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Peterson v. Ocean Electric Railway Co.
108 N.E. 199 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
108 N.E. 200, 214 N.Y. 605, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-the-ocean-electric-railway-company-ny-1915.