Peterson v. State

7 Ind. 560
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 9, 1856·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Davison, J.

This was a prosecution for retailing spirituous liquors without license, under an act of 1853. Motion to quash the information overruled. The defendant was found guilty, and judgment given for the state.

B. Smith, for the appellants.

The first section of the above act provides, that no person shall retail spirituous liquors without license, &c., “except for sacramental, chemical, mechanical, medicinal or culinary purposes.” Neither the affidavit nor information negatives the exception. It follows that the motion to quash should have been sustained. Acts of 1853, p. 87.-4 Ind. E. 601, 602, 603.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterson v. State, 7 Ind. 560 (Ind. 1856).

7 Ind. 560 (Peterson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jalbert v. State
165 N.E. 522 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1928)
Steinkuehler v. Wempner
81 N.E. 482 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1907)
State v. Reynolds
9 N.E. 287 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1886)
Russell v. State
50 Ind. 174 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1875)