Peterson v. State

24 So. 3d 686, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19773, 2009 WL 4874800
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peterson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 983 So. 2d 27
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 18, 2009·No. No. 5D09-3733·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sylvester Peterson appeals from an order summarily denying seven of eight issues raised in his motion for postconviction relief, and setting the eighth issue for an evidentiary hearing. This is a non-final order, which cannot be appealed until the trial court issues its final ruling on the last issue raised in Peterson’s motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(1) and 9.130(3); Canfield v. Cantele, 837 So.2d 371, 375 (Fla.2002). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED.

MONACO, C.J., and LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterson v. State, 24 So. 3d 686, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19773, 2009 WL 4874800 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

24 So. 3d 686 (Peterson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caufield v. Cantele
837 So. 2d 371 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)