Peterson v. State
548 So. 2d 841, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2142, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5059, 1989 WL 104036
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peterson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 530 So. 2d 424 →
Opinion
Appellant appeals her conviction of first degree murder on the ground that the State did not prove premeditation beyond a reasonable doubt. We conclude that the facts of the present case satisfy the test for premeditation set forth in Tien Wang v. State, 426 So.2d 1004, 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 434 So.2d 889 (Fla.1983), and resemble the circumstances of Covington v. State, 302 So.2d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). See also Phippen v. State, 389 So.2d 991, 993 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peterson v. State, 548 So. 2d 841, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2142, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5059, 1989 WL 104036 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
548 So. 2d 841 (Peterson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Phippen v. State
389 So. 2d 991 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Tien Wang v. State
426 So. 2d 1004 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Covington v. State
302 So. 2d 483 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)