Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Peterson v. State

Peterson v. State

480 So. 2d 245, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 104, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6054
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peterson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 530 So. 2d 424 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 1985·No. No. 85-179·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The imposition of costs is reversed for failure to comply with the notice and hearing requirements exemplified by the holding in Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984) without prejudice to imposition of costs upon compliance with those requirements, for which purpose we remand. The cause is otherwise affirmed.

CONVICTION and SENTENCE AFFIRMED. COSTS REVERSED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL, J., and ROSEMARY BARKETT (Associate Judge), concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterson v. State, 480 So. 2d 245, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 104, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6054 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

480 So. 2d 245 (Peterson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)