Peterson v. State

408 So. 2d 758, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18945
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 13, 1982
DocketNo. 80-834
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 408 So. 2d 758 (Peterson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peterson v. State, 408 So. 2d 758, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18945 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion based upon Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant contends her conviction and sentence were the result of ineffective assistance of counsel and requests a new trial. We previously remanded this matter to the trial court for specific findings of fact and conclusions of law on this issue. Based upon the trial court’s order pursuant to this remand, we conclude that ineffective assistance of counsel has been demonstrated and her conviction is hereby vacated.

REVERSED.

DOWNEY and BERANEK, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr. (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lonestar Florida, Inc. v. Cooper
408 So. 2d 758 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
408 So. 2d 758, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.