Peterson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Peterson v. State

200 So. 2d 829, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4557

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 28, 1967

DocketNo. 7295

StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 2d 829 (Peterson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peterson v. State, 200 So. 2d 829, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4557 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant in the trial court, was charged with forging and uttering certain bank checks in the amount of $68.50 each in two counts in violation of Section 831.01 and 831.02 of Florida Statutes, F.S.A. Defendant was represented by public defender at the time of arraignment and by private counsel at the time of trial. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury returned a verdict of guilty and the trial court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and sentenced him to serve five years on each count with sentences to run concurrently. After denial of defendant’s motion for a new trial, this appeal followed.

We have reviewed all papers contained in the case, including the briefs and transcript of proceedings, and find that the points assigned by appellant are without merit. The trial court committed no error in denial of the motion for new trial and the evidence is wholly sufficient to support the judgment and sentence. For these reasons the decision of the trial court is affirmed.

ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant in the trial court, was charged with forging and uttering certain bank checks in the amount of $68.50 each in two counts in violation of Section 831.01 and 831.02 of Florida Statutes, F.S.A. Defendant was represented by public defender at the time of arraignment and by private counsel at the time of trial. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury returned a verdict of guilty and the trial court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and sentenced him to serve five years on each count with sentences to run concurrently. After denial of defendant’s motion for a new trial, this appeal followed.

We have reviewed all papers contained in the case, including the briefs and transcript of proceedings, and find that the points assigned by appellant are without merit. The trial court committed no error in denial of the motion for new trial and the evidence is wholly sufficient to support the judgment and sentence. For these reasons the decision of the trial court is affirmed.

ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 So. 2d 829, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.