Peterson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided October 6, 2020·No. 17-732·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

******************** * ALAN PETERSON, * * No. 17-732V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: September 9, 2020 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; influenza (“flu”) vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * SIRVA; shoulder injury; significant * aggravation. * Respondent. * ******************** *

Shealene P. Mancuso, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner; Debra A. Filteau Begley, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On September 9, 2020, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Alan Peterson on June 2, 2017. Petitioner alleged that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on October 27, 2015, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused him to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) or, in the alternative, caused a significant aggravation of a pre-existing shoulder condition. Petitioner further alleges that he suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition.

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. Respondent denies that the vaccine either caused or significantly aggravated petitioner’s alleged injury or any other injury, and denies that petitioner’s current disabilities are the result of a vaccine-related injury.

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $25,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 17-732V according to this decision and the attached stipulation.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2020).

Peterson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Peterson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a