Peterson v. Scandurra Trucking Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peterson v. Scandurra Trucking Co.

245 A.D.2d 358, 666 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12807

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D.2d 358 (Peterson v. Scandurra Trucking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peterson v. Scandurra Trucking Co., 245 A.D.2d 358, 666 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.), dated December 4, 1996, which granted the separate motions of the defendant Ernest L. Biggs s/h/a Berrest L. Biggs and the defendant Arttin Kofi for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[359]*359The Supreme Court correctly determined that the defendants Ernest L. Biggs s/h/a Berrest L. Biggs and Arttin Kofi, whose vehicles were struck from behind while stopped at a red traffic light, were entitled to summary judgment (see, Corbly v Butler, 226 AD2d 418; Abramowicz v Roberto, 220 AD2d 374; Gambino v City of New York, 205 AD2d 583). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.), dated December 4, 1996, which granted the separate motions of the defendant Ernest L. Biggs s/h/a Berrest L. Biggs and the defendant Arttin Kofi for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[359]*359The Supreme Court correctly determined that the defendants Ernest L. Biggs s/h/a Berrest L. Biggs and Arttin Kofi, whose vehicles were struck from behind while stopped at a red traffic light, were entitled to summary judgment (see, Corbly v Butler, 226 AD2d 418; Abramowicz v Roberto, 220 AD2d 374; Gambino v City of New York, 205 AD2d 583). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D.2d 358, 666 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-scandurra-trucking-co-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack