Peterson v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Florida

Peterson v. Ryan

27 So. 2d 677, 158 Fla. 55, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 472

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 22, 1946·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from a declaratory decree holding W. R. Stigler to be the democratic nominee for County Commissioner in and for District No. 2 of Volusia County. We find no error in the d'ecree; however the record reveals that an appeal is being prosecuted to this court from a judgment in mandamus wherein the validity of a resolution redistricting the county commissioners’ districts is brought into question. We now affirm the decree appealed from without prejudice to the right to review the latter judgment on appeal by due course of law.

*56 So ordered.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from a declaratory decree holding W. R. Stigler to be the democratic nominee for County Commissioner in and for District No. 2 of Volusia County. We find no error in the d'ecree; however the record reveals that an appeal is being prosecuted to this court from a judgment in mandamus wherein the validity of a resolution redistricting the county commissioners’ districts is brought into question. We now affirm the decree appealed from without prejudice to the right to review the latter judgment on appeal by due course of law.

*56 So ordered.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Peterson v. Ryan, 27 So. 2d 677, 158 Fla. 55, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 472 (Fla. 1946).

Pincite

27 So. 2d 677 (Peterson v. Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.