Peterson v. Rubin
275 A.D.2d 675
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 14, 1949
StatusPublished
This text of 275 A.D.2d 675 (Peterson v. Rubin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peterson v. Rubin, 275 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).
Opinion
Nolan, P. J., Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur; Carswell and Sneed, J J., dissent and vote to affirm on the ground that the record adequately presented questions of fact for determination by the jury, which determination is amply supported by the evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-rubin-nyappdiv-1949.