Peterson v. Roberts
This text of 1940 OK 47 (Peterson v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action involves the constitutionality of Senate Bill No. 186 of the 17th Legislature (art. 22, ch. 65, S. L. 1939, 68 Okla. St. Ann. § 184e et *497 seq.), authorizing the reduction of assessment for prior years. The act is in all material respects identical with an act passed by the Legislature in 1937, which was held unconstitutional by this court in Ivester v. State (1938) 183 Okla. 519, 83 P. 2d 193. The Legislature, in effect, re-enacted the bill after this court had held it unconstitutional.
Plaintiff sought a writ of mandamus, which the trial court denied, and plaintiff brings this appeal. It is contended that this act is materially different from the one previously held unconstitutional and that the decision in the Ivester Case should be overruled. The contentions made with reference to the distinctions between the 1937 and 1939 acts are not of sufficient merit to justify any comment, and we reaffirm our decision in the Ivester Case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1940 OK 47, 100 P.2d 431, 186 Okla. 496, 1940 Okla. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-roberts-okla-1940.