Peterson v. Pierce
This text of 2013 ND 198 (Peterson v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 11/21/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2013 ND 198
Carrie Peterson, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Mara Pierce, and all others in possession, Defendants
Mara Pierce Appellant
No. 20130164
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Wickham Corwin, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Carrie Peterson, self-represented, 3226 13th Ave. S., Fargo, ND 58103, plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Ann E. Miller (argued), Tyler S. Carlson (on brief), and Krista L. Andrews (on brief), P.O. Box 10247, Fargo, ND 58106-0247, for defendant and appellant.
Peterson v. Pierce
[¶1] Mara Pierce appealed from a money judgment entered by the district court following an eviction hearing. Pierce argues the district court erred in concluding she did not make an effective rent payment by placing $1,400 cash in her landlord’s unsecured mailbox. The district court found Pierce placed the cash in her landlord’s mailbox, but that the landlord did not receive it. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 ND 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-pierce-nd-2013.