Peterson v. Olson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peterson v. Olson

255 A.D. 1029, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6311

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 1029 (Peterson v. Olson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peterson v. Olson, 255 A.D. 1029, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6311 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: A fair question of fact is presented by the evidence. We have examined the record for errors of fact and of law and do not find any sufficiently serious to require the granting of a new trial. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: A fair question of fact is presented by the evidence. We have examined the record for errors of fact and of law and do not find any sufficiently serious to require the granting of a new trial. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 1029, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-olson-nyappdiv-1938.