Peterson v. Modern Woodmen
226 P. 1119, 130 Wash. 705, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 1037
This text of 226 P. 1119 (Peterson v. Modern Woodmen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peterson v. Modern Woodmen, 226 P. 1119, 130 Wash. 705, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 1037 (Wash. 1924).
Opinion
On Rehearing.
Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adhere to the Departmental opinion heretofore filed herein, as reported in 127 Wash. 412, 220 Pac. 80§, and the judgment of the trial court is therefore reversed with directions to enter judgment for the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Peterson v. Modern Woodmen of America
220 P. 809 (Washington Supreme Court, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
226 P. 1119, 130 Wash. 705, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 1037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-modern-woodmen-wash-1924.