Peterson v. . McLamb

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Peterson v. . McLamb

19 S.E.2d 488, 221 N.C. 538, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 505

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 8, 1942·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Plaintiff appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court holding that upon the facts found by the referee the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. This Court being evenly divided in opinion as to the correctness of this ruling, Justice Schenck not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, without becoming a precedent.

The death of the plaintiff pending appeal having been suggested, upon her motion Eva L. Peterson, administratrix, is made party plaintiff in lieu of William Peterson, the decedent. Rule 37.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

Plaintiff appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court holding that upon the facts found by the referee the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. This Court being evenly divided in opinion as to the correctness of this ruling, Justice Schenck not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, without becoming a precedent.

The death of the plaintiff pending appeal having been suggested, upon her motion Eva L. Peterson, administratrix, is made party plaintiff in lieu of William Peterson, the decedent. Rule 37.

Judgment affirmed.

Peterson v. . McLamb, 19 S.E.2d 488, 221 N.C. 538, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 505 (N.C. 1942).

Pincite

19 S.E.2d 488 (Peterson v. . McLamb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.