Peterson v. McAllister
This text of 236 A.D. 809 (Peterson v. McAllister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The record on the present appeal fully supports the findings and conclusions that plaintiff did not have an easement over the property of the defendants but merely possessed a revocable license which the defendants had a right to and did revoke. Present —■ Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-mcallister-nyappdiv-1932.