Peterson v. McAllister
This text of 93 S.E. 524 (Peterson v. McAllister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. When considered in the light of the entire charge of the court and of the facts of the case, the instructions complained of contain no error.
2. So much of the requested instructions as was legal and pertinent was sufficiently covered by the charge of the court.
3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err ' in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 S.E. 524, 21 Ga. App. 48, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-mcallister-gactapp-1917.