Peterson v. Marzall
195 F.2d 778, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 279, 92 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 342, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4338
This text of 195 F.2d 778 (Peterson v. Marzall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peterson v. Marzall, 195 F.2d 778, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 279, 92 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 342, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4338 (D.C. Cir. 1952).
Opinion
This is a suit under 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, R.S. § 4915, for a patent on an electrically insulating layer structure such as a floor rug. We see no reason to disturb the finding of the Patent Office and the District Court that the claims fail to show invention over the patents cited by appellee.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 63
35 U.S.C. § 63
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
195 F.2d 778, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 279, 92 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 342, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-marzall-cadc-1952.