Peterson v. Krinick

148 A. 924, 8 N.J. Misc. 1, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 13
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedDecember 21, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 148 A. 924 (Peterson v. Krinick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peterson v. Krinick, 148 A. 924, 8 N.J. Misc. 1, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 13 (N.J. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an application for rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted on the ground that the verdict was excessive. An examination of the proofs and the arguments leads ns to the conclusion that a rule to show cause should issue. Let it issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 A. 924, 8 N.J. Misc. 1, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-krinick-nj-1929.