Peterson v. Kouty

171 N.W. 905, 103 Neb. 321, 1919 Neb. LEXIS 46
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 27, 1919
DocketNo. 20384
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 171 N.W. 905 (Peterson v. Kouty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peterson v. Kouty, 171 N.W. 905, 103 Neb. 321, 1919 Neb. LEXIS 46 (Neb. 1919).

Opinion

Rose, J.

This is an action of ejectment. The defense was adverse possession. From a judgment of dismissal on a verdict in favor of defendant, plaintiff has appealed.-

Two questions are presented — the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the-verdict, and the right of plaintiff to a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

An examination of the evidence shows that it is sufficient to justify the finding that defendant had been in the open, notorious, exclusive, continuous, adverse possession under a claim of right for ten years.

The question of .diligence on the part of plaintiff was a factor in determining his right to a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. On this issue an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in refusing to grant a new trial is not shown by the record.

Affirmed.

LettoN, Sedgwick and CorNIsh, JJ., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrill County v. Bliss
251 N.W. 106 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1933)
Blaha v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
230 N.W. 453 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1930)
Allender v. Chicago & NorthWestern Railway Co.
230 N.W. 102 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 N.W. 905, 103 Neb. 321, 1919 Neb. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-kouty-neb-1919.