Peterson v. Kijakazi

District Court, D. Alaska·Decided April 18, 2023·No. 1:21-cv-00022·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

JOHN PETERSON, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Case No. 1:21-cv-00022-SLG Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO FEES UNDER EAJA Before the Court at Docket 26 is the Parties’ Stipulation to Fees Under EAJA. Upon due consideration, the Stipulation at Docket 26 is GRANTED in the amount of $10,750.00. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct 2521 (2010), EAJA fees are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program. This Court orders that any amount of

the above award not offset pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program shall be made payable to Plaintiff, with a check mailed to the office of Karl Osterhout, Esq.: Karl Osterhout, Esq. Osterhout Berger Disability Law 521 Cedar Way, Suite 200 Oakmont, PA 15139 In light of the Stipulation at Docket 26, the Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act at Docket 25 is DENIED as moot. DATED this 18th day of April, 2023, at Anchorage, Alaska. /s/ Sharon L. Gleason UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 1:21-cv-00022-SLG, Peterson v. Kijakazi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterson v. Kijakazi, (D. Alaska 2023).

Peterson v. Kijakazi (Peterson v. Kijakazi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)