Peterson v. Hutchinson
This text of 107 N.W. 1124 (Peterson v. Hutchinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was brought to recover the value of certain household goods belonging to the plaintiff, which, it was alleged, the defendant had converted to his own use. After a trial by the court without a jury, findings of fact and conclusions of law were made in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff appealed to this court from an order denying his motion to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law.
An examination of the record fails to disclose any reversible error. But an order denying a motion to amend findings is not appealable. Rogers v. Hedemark, 70 Minn. 441, 73 N. W. 252; Wheadon v. Mead, 71 Minn. 322, 73 N. W. 975; Savings Bank of St. Paul v. St. Paul Plow Co., 76 Minn. 7, 78 N. W. 873; Lamprey v. St. Paul & C. Ry. Co., 86 Minn. 509, 91 N. W. 29.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 N.W. 1124, 98 Minn. 452, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-hutchinson-minn-1906.