Peterson v. Hunter

174 So. 3d 625, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13806, 2015 WL 5438538
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 16, 2015
DocketNo. 1D15-2641
StatusPublished

This text of 174 So. 3d 625 (Peterson v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peterson v. Hunter, 174 So. 3d 625, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13806, 2015 WL 5438538 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of June 10, 2015, the Court has determined that the appeal is untimely with respect to the February 26, 2015, Order Finding Probable Cause and Directing Defendant to Respond. The Court has also determined that neither the May 8, 2015 order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss, nor the June 9, 2015 order reiterating that ruling is a final order or an otherwise appealable non-final order. See Miami-Dade County v. Perez, 988 So.2d 40, 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

WOLF, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miami-Dade County v. Perez
988 So. 2d 40 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 So. 3d 625, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13806, 2015 WL 5438538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-hunter-fladistctapp-2015.