Peterson v. Hasey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Peterson v. Hasey

509 So. 2d 411, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9368

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 15, 1987

DocketNo. 4-86-3162

StatusPublished

This text of 509 So. 2d 411 (Peterson v. Hasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peterson v. Hasey, 509 So. 2d 411, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9368 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant Tom Peterson’s Motion To Abate For Improper Venue. We affirm because Mr. Peterson, the party challenging venue, has not met his burden of demonstrating that plaintiff’s selection of venue is erroneous. Perry Building Systems, Inc. v. Hayes & Bates, Inc., 361 So.2d 443 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). See generally, 3 Fla. Jur.2d, Appellate Review § 316.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant Tom Peterson’s Motion To Abate For Improper Venue. We affirm because Mr. Peterson, the party challenging venue, has not met his burden of demonstrating that plaintiff’s selection of venue is erroneous. Perry Building Systems, Inc. v. Hayes & Bates, Inc., 361 So.2d 443 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). See generally, 3 Fla. Jur.2d, Appellate Review § 316.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

509 So. 2d 411, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-hasey-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack