Peterson v. Harville
This text of 623 F.2d 611 (Peterson v. Harville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
623 F.2d 611
Helen M. PETERSON, Kaye Peterson, Alan Peterson, William
Peterson, Linda Peterson, Pamela Peterson and
Julia Dupuis, Plaintiffs-Appellees and
Cross-Appellants,
v.
Danny Lloyd HARVILLE, Len Gabrielson, Grant S. Kesler,
Stephen Morgan, Ford G. Scalley and Larry V. Lunt,
a Professional Corporation, Defendants, and
Grant S. Kesler, an individual, Stephen W. Wade, Richard V.
Francis, Bruce V. Broadhead, and Leon Peterson,
Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees.
Nos. 78-2051, 78-2080.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 18, 1980.
Robert E. Maloney, Jr., John M. Berman, Dezendorf, Spears, Lubersky & Campbell, Portland, Or. (on brief), John M. Berman, Portland, Or. (argued), for Kesler.
Gerald R. Pullen, Portland, Or., for Peterson.
Before SNEED and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and GRAY*, District Judge.
After a review of the record in this case, we affirm the judgment of the district court on the grounds stated in its opinion. Peterson v. Harville, 445 F.Supp. 16 (D. Or. 1977).
Honorable William P. Gray, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
623 F.2d 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-harville-ca9-1980.