Peterson v. Florence County

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 19, 2011
Docket2011-MO-038
StatusUnpublished

This text of Peterson v. Florence County (Peterson v. Florence County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peterson v. Florence County, (S.C. 2011).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court


James W. Peterson, Jr., as Receiver for Pee Dee Land Company, LLC and on behalf of its wholy-owned subsidiary Waverly Woods at Claussen, LLC, Respondents,

v.

Florence County, Respondent,

and Dean C. Fowler, Jr., in his official capacity as Florence County Treasurer, and H. Wayne Joye, in his official capacity as Florence County Auditor, Appellants.


AFFIRMED


Appeal From Florence County
 Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge


Memorandum Opinion No. 2011-MO-038
Submitted December 14, 2011 – Filed December 19, 2011  


Kevin A. Hall and M. Todd Carroll, of Hall & Bowers, of Columbia, for Appellants.

Charles E. Carpenter, Jr. and Carmen V. Ganjehsani, of Carpenter Appeals and Trial Support, of Columbia, for Respondent Pee Dee Land Company, LLC.

Michael Charles Abbott, of Abbott & McKissick Law Firm, of Florence, for Respondent Florence County.


PER CURIAM:  Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:  Issue I: Ward v. State, 343 S.C. 14, 538 S.E.2d 245 (2000); Issues II and III: Condon v. State, 354 S.C. 634, 583 S.E.2d 430 (2003); Issue IV: Rule 24(a)(2), SCRCP; Ex parte Government Employee's Ins. Co., 373 S.C. 132, 644 S.E.2d 699 (2007); Ex parte Reichlyn, 310 S.C. 495, 427 S.E.2d 661 (1993); Davis v. Jennings, 304 S.C. 502, 405 S.E.2d 601 (1991); Berkeley Elec. Co-op., Inc. v. Town of Mt. Pleasant, 302 S.C. 186, 394 S.E.2d 712 (1990); S.C. Tax Comm'n v. Union County Treasurer, 295 S.C. 257, 368 S.E.2d 72 (Ct. App. 1988).

AFFIRMED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berkeley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Town of Mt. Pleasant
394 S.E.2d 712 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1990)
Davis v. Jennings
405 S.E.2d 601 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)
Ex Parte Government Employee's Ins. Co.
644 S.E.2d 699 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2007)
South Carolina Tax Commission v. Union County Treasurer
368 S.E.2d 72 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1988)
Ex Parte Condon v. State
583 S.E.2d 430 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2003)
Ward v. State
538 S.E.2d 245 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Peterson v. Florence County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-florence-county-sc-2011.