Peterson v. Fisher Body Co.

167 N.W. 987, 201 Mich. 529, 1918 Mich. LEXIS 764
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 3, 1918·No. Docket No. 59·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Fellows, J.

Plaintiff, an employee of defendant Fisher Body Company, received an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment on either the 20th or 27th day of September, 1912. The accident consisted in getting pieces of steel in his left eye. His notice of claim for compensation is dated March 23, 1917, and was received by the employer and the industrial accident board a few days later. The plaintiff claims not to have lost sight in the injured eye until less than six months before making the claim for compensation. It was not removed until June 29, 1917. The case was heard by the board before this court decided the cases of Cooke v. Furnace Co., 200 Mich. 192; Kalucki v. Foundry Co., 200 Mich. 604; Dane v. Traction Co., 200 Mich. 612, and Schild v. Railroad Co., 200 Mich. 614. Consistent with its holding in these cases the board held that the six months' period given the employee to make claim for compensation (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5445) did not begin to run until the employee definitely learned that he had lost the sight of his eye. In the cases cited we did not agree with the construction placed upon this section of the act by the board, but held that [531]*531while the words “accident” and “injury” are not synonymous, that the accident produced the injury and in point of time they were concurrent. We therefore held in each of the cases cited that a claim for compensation made by the employee more than six months after the happening of the accident was not seasonably made, that the statute began to run from the date of the accident, and vacated the award. The present case is ruled by these cases. The claim for compensation in the instant case was not made until about four and one-half years after the accident— after the injury.

The award must be vacated.

Ostrander, C. J., and Bird, Moore, Steere, Brooke, Stone, and Kuhn, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterson v. Fisher Body Co., 167 N.W. 987, 201 Mich. 529, 1918 Mich. LEXIS 764 (Mich. 1918).

167 N.W. 987 (Peterson v. Fisher Body Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Palchak v. Murray Corp. of America
28 N.W.2d 295 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1947)
La Duke v. Consumers Power Co.
301 N.W. 16 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1941)
Larosa v. Ford Motor Co.
259 N.W. 122 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1935)
Martini, Et Ux. v. Coal Co.
265 P. 707 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1928)
United States Casualty Co. v. Smith
133 S.E. 851 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Garbouska Case
130 A. 180 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1925)
Ex Parte Harper
97 So. 140 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)
Harper v. O'Rear
97 So. 140 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)
Rubin v. Fisher Body Corp.
172 N.W. 534 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1919)
Curtis v. Slater Construction Co.
168 N.W. 958 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1918)
Brown v. Weston-Mott Co.
168 N.W. 437 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1918)