Peterson v. Dunn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peterson v. Dunn

260 A.D. 988, 24 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5703

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 988 (Peterson v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peterson v. Dunn, 260 A.D. 988, 24 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Dowling and Harris, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the ground that the court erred in not submitting to the jury the question of defendant’s liability for injuries resulting to plaintiff when defendant’s car ran over him. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Dowling and Harris, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the ground that the court erred in not submitting to the jury the question of defendant’s liability for injuries resulting to plaintiff when defendant’s car ran over him. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 988, 24 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-dunn-nyappdiv-1940.